A simulation-based feasibility assessment of malic acid production from molasses using Rhizopus arrhizus
Main Article Content
Abstract
Malic acid is a valuable organic acid widely used in food, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries. It can be sustainably produced from underutilized molasses, often classified as waste. This study evaluated the feasibility of malic acid production from molasses, using Rhizopus arrhizus. A SuperPro Designer simulation integrated process design, economic analysis, and sensitivity evaluation and the results demonstrated economic viability with a Net Present Value (NPV) of $2,140,000 (7% discount rate), an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 15.81%, a Return on Investment (ROI) of 22.70, and a payback period (PP) of 4.40 years for an annual production capacity of 2,830 MT. Sensitivity analysis highlighted the selling price of malic acid as the most important economic factor. This feasibility study provides a novel approach to integrate molasses-based fermentation with simulation tools, offering actionable insights for industrial-scale implementation by quantifying key economic drivers.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. S. Zhang, J. Wang, and H. Jiang, Microbial production of value-added bioproducts and enzymes from molasses, a by-product of sugar industry, Food Chem. 346 (2021) 128860.
3. B. Bharathiraja et al., Techno economic analysis of malic acid production using crude glycerol derived from waste cooking oil, Bioresour. Technol. 351 (March) (2022) 126956.
4. A. Kövilein et al., Malic acid production from renewables: a review, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 95 (3) (2020) 513–526.
5. T. Ghaffar et al., Recent trends in lactic acid biotechnology: A brief review on production to purification, J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 7 (2) (2014) 222–229.
6. L. Jiang et al., Butyric acid fermentation in a fibrous bed bioreactor with immobilized Clostridium tyrobutyricum from cane molasses, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (13) (2009) 3403–3409.
7. R.D. Di Lorenzo et al., State of the Art on the Microbial Production of Industrially Relevant Organic Acids, Catalysts 12 (234) (2022) 1–23.
8. V. Juturu and J.C. Wu, Microbial production of lactic acid: the latest development, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 36 (6) (2016) 967–977.
9. J.A. Lee, J.H. Ahn, and S.Y. Lee, Organic acids: Succinic and malic acids, in Compr. Biotechnol., Third Edit, Elsevier, (2019): pp. 172–187.
10. E. Sarka et al., Molasses as a by-product of sugar crystallization and a perspective raw material, Procedia Eng. 42 (August) (2012) 1219–1228.
11. A. Naude and W. Nicol, Malic acid production through the whole-cell hydration of fumaric acid with immobilised Rhizopus oryzae, Biochem. Eng. J. 137 (2018) 152–161.
12. M.Y. Efendi et al., Techno-economics analysis of biosurfactants productions from pseudomonas aeruginosa OPEFB-based with variationsin purifications method, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1267 (1) (2023).
13. D. Vishnu, B. Dhandapani, and S. Mahadevan, Recent advances in organic acid production from microbial sources by utilizing agricultural by-products as substrates for industrial applications, in Handb. Environ. Chem., (2020): pp. 67–87.
14. V. Martin-Dominguez et al., Kinetic modelling of the coproduction process of fumaric and malic acids by Rhizopus arrhizus NRRL 1526, Processes 8 (2) (2020).
15. Y. Chisti, Fermentation Technology, in W. Soetaert, E.J. Vandamme (Eds.), Ind. Biotechnol. Sustain. Growth Econ. Success, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, (2010): pp. 149–171.
16. M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus, and R.E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, New York, (2003).
17. G. Towler and R. Sinnot, Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, practice and economics of plant and process design, 2nd ed., Elsevier Inc, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, (2013).
18. C. Cheng et al., Polymalic acid fermentation by Aureobasidium pullulans for malic acid production from soybean hull and soy molasses: Fermentation kinetics and economic analysis, Bioresour. Technol. 223 (2017) 166–174.
19. W. Zeng et al., Poly(malic acid) production from liquefied corn starch by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with a novel isolated Aureobasidium pullulans GXL-1 strain and its techno-economic analysis, Bioresour. Technol. 304 (February) (2020) 122990.
20. P. Wei et al., Production of poly(malic acid) from sugarcane juice in fermentation by Aureobasidium pullulans: Kinetics and process economics, Bioresour. Technol. 224 (2017) 581–589.
21. E. Mancini et al., Economic and environmental analysis of bio-succinic acid production: From established processes to a new continuous fermentation approach with in-situ electrolytic extraction, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 179 (2022) 401–414.