Performance measurement of the upgraded Microcab-H4 with academic drive cycle

Main Article Content

Luthfi Rais
Peter Fisher
Aman Dhir
Robert Steinberger-Wilckens


The original Microcab-H4, a hybrid fuel cell car, was tested with Academic drive cycle. After several years, the car was upgraded and tested with the ECE 15 drive cycle. The result showed the car has higher energy efficiency. However, the result could not be compared to the original car due to different drive cycle test. This research was done to measure the performance and energy efficiency of the Upgraded Microcab-H4 with Academic drive cycle. The measure of car energy efficiency was done through four tests: Run on battery, run on battery and Ballard fuel cell, and run on battery, Ballard, and Horizon fuel cell. The energy efficiency was calculated based on the hydrogen consumption after 5 cycles. The lowest energy efficiency was run on battery and Ballard fuel cell with (1.01 km/MJ). The highest energy efficiency was run on battery, Ballard, and Horizon fuel cells (1.10 km/MJ), which is higher than previous tests.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rais, L., Fisher, P., Dhir, A., & Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2016). Performance measurement of the upgraded Microcab-H4 with academic drive cycle. Communications in Science and Technology, 1(1).
Author Biography

Luthfi Rais, University of Birmingham, UK

Luthfi Rais received a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from Universitas Indonesia and a master’s degree in Advanced Chemical Engineering from University of Birmingham, UK.


1. I. Staffel, Results from the Microcab fuel cell vehicle demonstration at the University of Birmingham, Int. J. Electric and Hybrid Vehicles 3(1) (2012) 62-81.

2. J. Shang, The role of hydrogen and fuel cell for ultra low carbon vehicle, PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK, 2012.

3. K. Kendall, B. G. Pollet, A. Dhir, I. Staffel, B. Millington and J. Jostins, Hydrogen fuel cell hybrid vehicles (HFCHV) for Birmingham campus, J. Power Sources 196 (2009) 325-330.

4. R. M. Moore, K. H. Hauer, S. Ramaswamy and J. M. Cunningham, Energy utilization and efficiency analysis for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, J. Power Sources 159 (2006) 1214-1230.

5. Fuelcell Store, 300W Fuel Cell STack User Manual, Horizon Fuel Cell Technology, 2013.

6. Ballard NexaTM, NexaTM Power Module User's Manual, Ballard Power System Inc, 2003.

7. Calb, CA180FI, 2011 [cited 2015 August 11]. Available from:

8. J. Zheng, J. Ye, J. Yang, P. Tang, L. Zhao and M. Kern, An optimized control method for a high utilization ratio and fast filling speed in hydrogen refueling stations, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 (2009) 3011-3017.

9. W. Chang, The state of charge estimating methods for battery: A review, ISRN Appl Math 2013 (2013) 1-7.

10. R. Nave, Static friction [internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 August 12]. Available from:

11. U. S. Kim, J. Yi, C. B. Shin, T. Han and S. Park, Modeling the thermal behavior of a lithium-ion battery during charge, J. Power Sources 196 (2011) 5115-5121.

12. M. Takahashi, S. Tobishima, K. Takei and Y. Sakura, Reaction behavior of LiFePO4 as a cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries, Solid State Ionics 148 (2002) 283-289.

13. R. Cipollone, D. D. Battista, M. Marchionni and C. Villante, Model based design and optimization of a fuel cell electric vehicle, Energy Procedia 4 (2014) 71-80.

14. D. C. Giancoli. Physics for Scientist and Engineers with Modern Physics and Mastering Physics. 4th Ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2008.