Evaluating 3-D positioning infrastructure quality and utilization: The potential improvement with multi-GNSS methods
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article evaluates the quality of the national 3-D positioning infrastructure using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to simulate the potential application of multi-GNSS method. The MCDM evaluation used coverage and availability of Indonesia Continuous Operating Reference System (INACORS) services, distribution of survey pillars, and accuracy of height determination using the Indonesian Geoid Model (INAGEOID). The term multi-GNSS method refers to the utilization of PPP method as a complement to the conventional differential GNSS method for the production of mapping control points. The results of this evaluation were complemented by a questionnaire analysis on the utilization of positioning infrastructure by respondents from various professional backgrounds. The MCDM evaluation results showed that Java had nearly 100% good or excellent 3-D positioning infrastructure quality. Other regions in Indonesia still had significant areas of average, fair, or even poor quality. The questionnaire results showed that many users have faced some problems in areas with fair or poor infrastructure quality. The application of multi-GNSS method can contribute to reduce up to half of the area with fair and poor positioning infrastructure quality.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. M. B. Higgins, An organisational model for a unified GNSS reference station network for Australia, J. Spat. Sci., 53 (2008) 81–95.
3. B. I. Geospasial, Peraturan badan informasi geospasial nomor 13 Tahun 2021 tentang sistem referensi geospasial Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: BIG, 2021.
4. B. I. Geospasial, InaCORS BIG satu referensi pemetaan Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: BIG, 2019.
5. K. Dawidowicz and G. Krzan, Coordinate estimation accuracy of static precise point positioning using on-line PPP service, a case study, Acta Geod. Geophys., 49 (2014) 37–55.
6. C. Pipitone, A. Maltese, M. L. Brutto, and G. Dardanelli, A review of selected applications of GNSS CORS and related experiences at the University of Palermo (Italy), Remote Sens., 15 (2023) 1-23.
7. A. Farah, Assessment study of static-PPP convergence behaviour using GPS, GLONASS and mixed GPS/GLONASS observations, Artif. Satell., 49 (2014) 55–61.
8. G. Dardanelli, A. Maltese, C. Pipitone, A. Pisciotta, and M. L. Brutto, NRTK, PPP or static, that is the question. Testing different positioning solutions for GNSS survey, Remote Sens., 13 (2021) 1-19.
9. S. Choy, S. Bisnath, and C. Rizos, Uncovering common misconceptions in GNSS precise point positioning and its future prospect, GPS Solut., 21 (2017) 13–22.
10. S. Choy and K. Harima, Satellite delivery of high-accuracy GNSS precise point positioning service: an overview for Australia, J. Spat. Sci., 64 (2019) 197–208.
11. M. Rabah, M. Elmewafey, and M. H. Farahan, Datum maintenance of the main Egyptian geodetic control networks by utilizing precise point positioning ‘PPP’ technique, NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys., 5 (2016) 96–105.
12. H. P. Plag and M. Pearlman, Geodetic global observing system, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2009.
13. B. S. Nasional, Standar nasional no. 19-6724-2002 tahun 2002 tentang jaring kontrol horizontal. Jakarta, Indonesia: BSN, 2002.
14. A. Cina, P. Dabove, A. M. Manzino, and M. Piras, Network real time kinematic (NRTK) positioning – description, architectures and performances, in Satellite positioning - methods, models and applications, London, UK: Intech, 2015.
15. G. Hausler and P. Collier, National positioning infrastructure: identifying and evaluating high accuracy GNSS service coverage across Australia, J. Spat. Sci., 58 (2013) 191–214.
16. N. Chiuman, D. Atunggal, and N. Widjajanti, Analisis tingkat ketersediaan dan cakupan dari continuously operating reference station (CORS) di pulau Jawa, J. Geospatial Inf. Sci. Eng., 4 (2021) 30–40.
17. E. Vargiu and M. Urru, Exploiting web scraping in a collaborative filtering- based approach to web advertising, Artif. Intell. Res., 2 (2012) 44-54.
18. J. Bertin, Graphics and graphic information-processing. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter, 1981.
19. R. E. Roth, Visual variables, in International encyclopedia of geography: people, earth, environment. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley, 2017
20. M. Arip, Y. Wanglin, and K. Hirose, Using neighborhood association area as new spatial data infrastructure to link public administrative data with GIS in Indonesia, Commun. Sci. Technol., 4 (2019), 20–29.
21. D. Atunggal, N. Widjajanti, T. Aditya, and A. Wahyudi, The role of positioning infrastructure and mapping surveys in 3D cadastre implementation for mass rapid transport infrastructures – Indonesia case, 7th Int. FIG Works. on 3D Cadast., Newyork, NY, USA, 2021 pp. 1–18.
22. B. I. Geospasial, Keputusan kepala badan informasi geospasial No.33.2 tahun 2021. Jakarta, Indonesia: BIG, 2021.
23. J. Dykes, A.M. MacEachren and M. J. Kraak. Exploring geovisualization, Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2005.
24. D. G. Cole, GIS cartography: a guide to effective map design. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2010.
25. H. Taherdoost and M. Madanchian, Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts,” Encycl., 3 (2023) 77–87.
26. C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos, Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 138 (2002) 229–246.
27. A. Joshi, S. Kale, S. Chandel, and D. Pal, Likert scale: explored and explained, Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 7 (2015) 396–403.
28. D. G. Bonett and T. A. Wright, Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning, J. Organ. Behav., 36 (2015) 1–31.
29. G. Hausler, National positioning infrastructure: technical , institutional and economic criteria for coordinating access to Australia’s GNSS CORS infrastructure, Ph.D Thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia, 2014.
30. P. Woodgate, I. Coppa, S. Choy, S. Phinn, L. Arnold, and M. Duckham, The Australian approach to geospatial capabilities; positioning, earth observation, infrastructure and analytics: issues, trends and perspectives, Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci., 20 (2017) 109–125.
31. I. C. S. Mapping (ICSM), Australian vertical working surface (AVWS) technical implementation plan, Melbourne, ANZ: ICSM, 2020.