Microalgae production using photo-bioreactor with intermittent aeration for municipal wastewater substrate and nutrient removal
Main Article Content
Abstract
Microalgae has emerged as a promising approach for removing substrate and nutrient from wastewater with the concomitant biofuel production. The substrate and nutrient removal are influenced by several factors such as C/N ratio, F/M ratio, pH, and DO. This study aims to determine the efficiency of substrate and nutrient removal with the growth rates of microalgae and biomass by varying the addition of aeration and substrate. Intermittently aerated reactors were used with the flow rate of 14 L/minute. The batch reactors were prepared by adding glucose substrate of 50 mg/L (Ra0A), 100 mg/L (Ra0B), and 150 mg/L (Ra0C) without aeration; 50 mg/L (Ra12A), 100 mg/L (Ra12B), and 150 mg/L (Ra12C) with 12-hour aeration, and 50 mg/L (Ra24A), 100 mg/L (Ra24B), and 150 mg/L (Ra24C) with 24-hour aeration. The substrate removal, expressed as chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the reactor with aeration, showed the efficiency of 73.88% ± 2.05 (12-hour aeration), 75.2% ± 3.97 (24hours aeration), and 69.86% ± 5.69(without aeration). Nutrient removal as ammonia-N (NH3-N) gave high removal value of 98.3% ± 0.11 and the removal of nutrient as phosphate (PO3-4) showed the efficiency of 54.3% ± 0.1. The growth rate of microalgae and biomass exhibited the highest value in Ra24C reactor with the values of 0.0229/day and 0.1295/day, respectively. The pH values indicated a shift from normal to alkaline while DO values increased by the addition of 12 and 24-hour aeration.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. A. F. Sa'adah, A. Fauzi, and B. Juanda, Peramalan penyediaan dan konsumsi bahan bakar minyak Indonesia dengan model sistem dinamik, J. Ekon. Pembangunan Indonesia 17(2) (2017) 118-137.
3. F. Alam, K. Saleque, Q. Alam, I. Mustary, H. Chowdhury, and R. Jazar, Dependence on energy in South Asia and the need for a regional solution, Energy Procedia 160 (2019) 26-33.
4. A. Ghorbani, M. R. Rahimpour, Y. Ghasemi and S. Raeissi, The biodiesel of microalgae as a solution for diesel demand in Iran. Energies, 11(4) (2018) 950.
5. H. Thoha, Recent harmful Algal blooms (HABs) events in Indonesia HAB and TMO. December, 2016. LIPI: Indonesia.
6. B. R. Sidharta, The current status of research on harmful algal bloom (HAB) in Indonesia, J. Coastal Devel. 8(2) (2005) 75-88.
7. Y. Chisti, Biodiesel from microalgae, Biotechnol. advances 25(3) (2007) 294-306.
8. E. Erlania, F. Widjaja and E. M. Adiwilaga, Penyimpanan rotifera instan (Brachionus rotundiformis) pada suhu yang berbeda dengan pemberian pakan mikroalga konsentrat. J. Riset Akuakultur 5(2) (2016) 287-297.
9. R. E. Yosta, D. Harimurti and O. Rachmaniah, Algae spirulina sp. oil extraction method using the osmotic and percolation and the effect on extractable components, J. Teknik Kimia 4(2) (2012) 287-294.
10. A. L. Ahmad, N. M. Yasin, C. J. C. Derek, and J. K. Lim, Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: a review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1) (2011) 584-593.
11. P. Foladori, S. Petrini and G. Andreottola, Evolution of real municipal wastewater treatment in photo-bioreactors and microalgae-bacteria consortia using real-time parameters, Chem. Eng. J. 345 (2018) 507-516.
12. S. Gao, C. Hu, S. Sun, J. Xu, Y. Zhao and H. Zhang, Performance of piggery wastewater treatment and biogas upgrading by three microalgal cultivation technologies under different initial COD concentration, Energy 165 (2018) 360-369.
13. H. Jiang, S. Luo, X. Shi, M. Dai and R. B. Guo, A novel microbial fuel cell and photo-bioreactor system for continuous domestic wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation, Biotechnol. Letters 34(7) (2012) 1269-1274.
14. A. Elawwad, A. Karam and K. Zaher, Using an algal photo-bioreactor as a polishing step for secondary treated wastewater, Polish J. Environ. Stud. 26(4) (2017) 1493–1500.
15. S. K. Singh, A. Bansal, M. K. Jha and A. Dey, Comparative studies on uptake of wastewater nutrients by immobilized cells of Chlorella minutissima and dairy waste isolated algae, Indian Chem. Eng. 53(4) (2011) 211-219.
16. I. Di Termini, A. Prassone, C. Cattaneo and M. Rovatti, On the nitrogen and phosphorus removal in algal photo-bioreactors. Ecological Eng. 37(6) (2011) 976-980.
17. U. EPA. Nitrification. Distribution System Issue Paper. Office of Water. Washington, DC, 2002.
18. G. Bitton. Wastewater microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
19. C. Y. Tan, N. M. N. Sulaiman, S. K. Loh and S. M. Phang, Chlorella biomass production in annular photo-bioreactor using palm oil mill effluent (POME): effect of hydrodynamics and mass transfer, irradiance, aeration rate and POME concentration, J. Oil Palm Res., 28(4) (2016) 496-509.
20. E. R. Tercero, E. Sforza, M. Morandini and A. Bertucco, Cultivation of Chlorella protothecoides with urban wastewater in continuous photo-bioreactor: biomass productivity and nutrient removal, Applied Biochem. Biotechnol. 172(3) (2014) 1470-1485.
21. I. W. K Suryawan and E. S. Sofiyah, Cultivation of Chlorella Sp. and Algae Mix for NH3-N and PO4-P Domestic Wastewater Removal. Civil Environ. Sci. J. 3(1) (2020) 31-36.
22. J. T. M. Elzenga, H.B. Prins and J. Stefels, J., The role of extracellular carbonic anhydrase activity in inorganic carbon utilization of Phaeocystis globosa (Prymnesiophyceae): a comparison with other marine algae using the isotopic disequilibrium technique, Limnology Oceanography 45(2) (2000) 372-380.
23. A. Converti, A. A. Casazza, E. Y. Ortiz, P. Perego, and M. Del Borghi, Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. Processing: Process Intens., 48(6) (2009) 1146-1151.
24. I. W. K. Suryawan, G. Prajati, A. S. Afifah, and M. R. Apritama. NH3-N and COD reduction in Endek (Balinese textile) wastewater by activated sludge under different DO condition with ozone pretreatment. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. (WJST). 18(1) (2020) 9127.