Trends and hot topics in green open space and ecological wisdom research
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Studies on green open space and ecological wisdom have developed over time and are linked to various subjects and impacts. However, both research subjects have developed somewhat independently despite their approaches often achieving a sustainable landscape. This paper proposed a bibliometric analysis of green open space and ecological wisdom research to identify the trends and hot topics on both aspects, then determine a potential topic for future research relating to both subject areas. We collected English research papers from the last decades from the Scopus database using appropriate keywords and analyzed the metadata using VOSviewer program. Then, the text data were extracted from the title and abstract of the document collections using VOSviewer built-in text mining function. The hot topic term was analyzed by calculating the score of the average citation based on their occurrences. Finally, potential research in green open space and ecological wisdom field was determined by overlaying the findings and catching the slice. A total of 283 document collections were analyzed and 75 most relevant terms were found. All the terms were divided into four clusters as a research field: urban green space cluster, environmental quality cluster, sustainable planning cluster, and landscape development cluster. Further, the hot topic analysis found ten keywords that had a high citation impact in document collection and mostly came from a sustainable planning cluster. After overlaying the findings, six terms emerged that have a high potential for future research because of their high citation impact for science.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. T. A. Randall, C. J. Churchill, B. W. Baetz, A GIS-based decision support system for neighbourhood greening, Environ Plan B: Planning and Design 30(4) (2003) 541-563. doi:10.1068/b12970.
3. M. Rakhshandehroo, M. J. M. Yusof, R. Arabi, M. Parva, A. Nochian, The Environmental Benefits of Urban Green Open Spaces, Alam Cipta 10(1) (2017) 10-16.
4. R. F. Young, K. Lieberknecht, From smart cities to wise cities: ecological wisdom as a basis for sustainable urban development, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62 (10) (2019) 1675-1692.
5. W. Shi, H. Woolley, Managing for Multifunctionality in Urban Open Spaces: Approaches for Sustainable Development, J Urban Manag (3) 1-2 (2014) 3-21.
6. O. C. Dewi, I. Chairunnisa, T. Hidayat, M. Anggraini, A. Napitupulu, Green Open Space: Awareness for Health or Sustainability?, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 120 (2018) 012014.
7. S. Kakoty, Ecology, sustainability and traditional wisdom, J Clean Prod. 172 (2018) 3215-3224.
8. J. Ferris, C. Norman, J. Sempik, People, land and sustainability: Community gardens and the social dimension of sustainable development, Soc Policy Adm. 35 (5) (2001) 559-568.
9. D.T. Patten, The role of ecological wisdom in managing for sustainable interdependent urban and natural ecosystems, Landsc Urban Plan. 155 (2016) 3-10.
10. A. Y. Firmansyah, Architecture Metabolism Approach Which Integrates the Concept Magersari in Supporting Balanced Development with Green Agricultural Land in Suburbs, Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 227 (2016) 609-616.
11. Y. Kusmarni, M. Holilah, The Ecological Wisdom Values of Agricultural Land Utilization by the Indigenous People of Cigugur Kuningan, West Java, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 145 (2018) 012026.
12. S. Barghjelveh, M. Mansouri, S. Y. Islami, The role of ecological networks in “Environmental logic-identity forming” design of urban regions, case study: Isfahan poladshahr urban region, J Environ Stud. 42 (1) (2016) 177-194.
13. A. W. Hasyim, R. E. P. Sianturi, A. R. T. Hidayat, Spatial Pattern of Land Cover Change in the Coastal Area of Gresik Regency, Indonesia Using Land Change Modeler, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 328 (2019) 012059.
14. B. Priyono, M. Rahayuningsih, M.S. Arifin, Economic value of trees based on water influence function in Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES), Sekaran Campus, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1321 (2019) 032047.
15. A. Min, J. H. Lee, A conceptual framework for the externalization of ecological Wisdom: The case of traditional Korean gardens, Sustain. 11 (2019) 5298.
16. S. Rennesson, Wrestling beetles and ecological wisdom: How insects contribute to the cosmopolitics of Northern Thailand, Southeast Asian Stud. 8 (1) (2019) 3-24.
17. A. A. K. Darmadi, N. N. Wirasiti, I. K. Ginantra, Diversity of species and benefits of telajakan plant as a potential tourism attraction in Bali, J Environ Manag Tour. 10 (1) (2019) 109-118.
18. F. Ali Ikhsan, B. Setioko, A. Suprapti. Ecological wisdom of Hindu- Javanese community settlement in Cetho Hamlet, Lawu Mountains, Central Java, Indonesia, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 99 (2018) 012016.
19. R. Maru, M. R. Abidin, A. Arfan, S. Nyompa, U. Sideng, S. Hasja, Mapping of protected forests and cultivated area in North Luwu South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Asian J Appl Sci. 9 (2016) 189-195.
20. T. Tupan, R. N. Rahayu, R. Rachmawati, E. S. R. Rahayu, Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bidang Ilmu Instrumentasi, Baca J Dokumentasi Dan Inf. 39 (2) (2018) 135-149.
21. H. N. Su, P. C. Lee, Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co- occurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight, Scientometrics 85 (2010) 65-79.
22. C. Chen. Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization. London: Springer-Verlag London, 2014.
23. N. J. Van Eck, L. Waltman, Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. Measuring Scholarly Impact, In: Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, D. Wolfram, (eds) Measuring Scholarly Impact. Switzerland: CamSpringer, Cham, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.
24. M. E. Falagas, E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, G. Pappas, Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses, FASEB J. 22(2) (2008) 338– 42.
25. N.J. Van Eck, L. Waltman. VOSviewer Manual - version 1.6.8. http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1. 5.4.pdf, 2018.
26. P. H. Gobster, (Text) Mining the LANDscape: Themes and trends over 40 years of Landscape and Urban Planning, Landsc Urban Plan. 126 (2014) 21–30.
27. D. Jeong, Y. Koo, Analysis of Trend and Convergence for Science and Technology using the VOSviewer, Int J Contents 12 (3) (2016) 54-58.
28. K. H. Liao, J. K. H. Chan, What is ecological wisdom and how does it relate to ecological knowledge?, Landscape and Urban Planning 155 (2016) 111-113.